top of page

Why Is Everything Always a Fire Drill?

RSR
Sep 22
2 min read

Updated: 7 days ago



Woman studies a production schedule board with Expedite notes and 17 changes as factory workers handle piling-up work.

Everyone may be working hard. That does not mean the work is flowing. 


A business can look busy and still be stuck. Sales is pushing to satisfy customers. Production is trying to protect the schedule. Purchasing is chasing materials. Customer service is asking for updates. Leadership sees all that motion and wonders why orders are still late. 


The easy explanation is that the company needs more people, more equipment, or more discipline. Sometimes it does. But before adding capacity, I want to understand how the current capacity is being used. Where is work waiting? Who is changing priorities? How often is scheduled work interrupted by an urgent request? What gets started but not finished? 


This is where the fire drills begin to make sense. Sales may be accepting work without seeing what is already committed. Production may be judged by how busy each person or machine appears rather than by how smoothly orders move through the entire process. A customer request becomes an emergency, the schedule is rearranged, and several other orders quietly become tomorrow's emergencies. 


No one has to be careless for this to happen. Each person may be making a reasonable decision based on the information available to them. The trouble is that each department sees only part of the work. When the whole flow is not visible, local decisions can create company-wide confusion. 


I would not begin by restructuring the organization chart. I would begin by following a few real orders from request to completion. I would note every handoff, wait, interruption, approval, restart, and change in priority. Then I would ask the people doing the work what they see that leadership cannot. 


That usually changes the conversation. Instead of asking who caused the delay, we can ask where the process made delay likely. Instead of assuming production needs more capacity, we can see whether existing capacity is being consumed by rework, expediting, small batches, missing information, or constant schedule changes. 


Capacity is not simply how many people or machines a business has. It is how much work the system can complete under real operating conditions that is actually ready for the next step. If ten hours of available time include three hours of waiting, two hours of rework, and an hour spent changing priorities, hiring another person may only give the chaos another place to spread. 


The goal is not to eliminate every surprise. Business is fluid by nature because it depends on people, customers, suppliers, and conditions that are not always controllable. The goal is to make the actual work visible so the business can respond to normal disruption without turning the rest of the schedule upside down. 


If everything feels urgent, I would resist the urge to start with a bigger team. First, make the work visible. A capacity problem may be real, but visibility helps show whether the business needs more capacity or needs to stop wasting the capacity it already has. 


Thinking about your own processes, where do you see work backing up regularly? Is it really a capacity problem? Or is capacity already there, but being wasted by waiting, rework, missing information, and shifting priorities? Before adding more people or equipment, it may be worth following the work to see what is actually getting in the way. 

Comments


bottom of page